Social Media Tools 101: Delicious

The delicious icon is made up of the four key colours of HTML.

The delicious icon is made up of the four key colours of HTML.

Delicious, or del.icio.us as it used to be known before it was revamped when it was bought by Yahoo! in 2005, is a social bookmarking site. Now, there will probably be 10% of you nodding your head saying, “yes, I know that already thanks,” But the vast majority are still getting to grips with social bookmarking (certainly compared with the numbers embracing social networks). The fact is that not only are social bookmarking and folksonomy tools the most useful things you’ll ever use during a day’s browsing, they also have a wealth of opportunities for brands looking to tap into the communications potential of the web.

What is Delicious anyway?

So, first of all, let’s run through what Delicious actually is. The amazing guys at Common Craft have created an entertaining and jargon-free video guide here, but in basic terms, social bookmarking tools like Delicious do exactly what they say on the tin. Just like you bookmark pages on your browser, social bookmarks allow you to save links to pages, which are stored to your account once you’ve registered. The obvious benefit of this is that you can access them anywhere – from work, from home, from an internet café in Mumbai etc etc, rather than them being stored on your browser on one machine. However, it was also Delicious and its ilk that actually drove the adoption of tagging bookmarks, meaning organising and navigating through your bookmarks is easy, regardless of how many you have. Every time you save a bookmark you add keywords or ‘tags’ that define why that page is interesting to you. This means if you’re looking for a website about needles in a haystack, simply click on the tag ‘needle’ and the tag ‘haystack’ and you’ll find what you’re looking for (even if it was hidden amongst thousands of other bookmarks).

Why are Social Bookmarks so special?

The key to the benefits of Delicious, however, lies in the word ’social’. Just as I can rifle through my own bookmarks using tags to find information relevant to what I’m looking for, I can also search through the bookmarks of those people in my network. For instance, if I’m a teacher compiling a lesson plan about WWII, I’m not just restricted to looking back at the pages I tagged as relevant to WWII, I can search those of my colleagues and contemporaries. It’s a knowledge sharing tool.

How can a brand use Delicious?

All of the above explains how Delicious is useful for any user on a day-to-day basis. However, there are a number of obvious (and not so obvious) ways to use Delicious from a brand perspective. These are: organisation, optimisation, community and insight (not necessarily in that order).

Organisation: If you’re a brand with a lot of content online that just doesn’t get used, then Delicious could be a huge asset for you. Adobe, for instance, has an amazing spectrum of tutorials for its software – and it uses Delicious very effectively to both organise that content and make it easily accessible for its users. Check out delicious.com/adobe to see what I mean.

Adobe uses Delicious to organise its thousands of online tutorials
Adobe uses Delicious to organise its thousands of online tutorials

Optimisation: If you want people to share your content, you should provide the Delicious icon on all of your news and dynamic content. As a dedicated Delicious user, I won’t pretend it makes the process much easier (I have the Delicious FireFox extension) but it does give me a quick reminder to bookmark something. There are also loads of SEO benefits to having content that is bookmarked on Delicious and other sites.

Community: It’s essential for brands to develop a relationship with its loyal customers, and social networks offer a fantastic opportunity to forge and maintain these relationships. Delicious is no different. If you’re looking to share links – perhaps you’re promoting a fashion brand and want to share sites of designers or fashion tips – then Delicious is a perfect place to keep them. Twitter integration also means you can automatically tweet whenever you save a bookmark.

Insight: Now here’s the really clever bit. If you navigate to http://www.delicious.com/url you can enter any URL and see who has bookmarked it, and what tags they used. This provides an amazing source of information not only on user experience (users often add notes to specific searches) but also on how users define your brand. Tiffany’s famously changed their SEO policy around the fact that people had tagged their home page on Delicious under ’shopping’ rather than ‘luxury’ and ‘diamonds’ which were the keywords they framed their SEO strategy around. Delicious tags don’t tell you how you want your brand to be defined, they tell you how your brand (and its website) is actually defined by its users. Used wisely, this is priceless information.

So there you have it – Delicious in a nutshell. There’s obviously much more to say that can’t fit in a single blog post so feel free to leave questions in the comments and we’ll do what we can to answer them.

Fonts! Fonts! Fonts!

Fonts

Last month I chipped in my two-penneth about what fonts we’ll all be seeing a bit more of in the new year. Well, it’s a brand new year, and my word new fonts and new type trends have just kept on coming.

This week has seen the launch of Commercial Type. A joint venture between Paul Barnes and Christian Schwartz, who have collaborated since 2004 on various typeface projects, most notably the award winning Guardian Egyptian. Type foundries are kind of the unsung heroes of the industry, toiling away thinking about ligatures, with most of the attention and glory going to cutting-edge designers who dabble in type.

Now – i’m using ‘dabble’ very loosely here, as I love Non-Format’s experiments with type (especially OTTO), and Si Scott’s ‘Hunter‘ is fantastic.

BUT. I am never going to use these on anything I lay my hands on between 9 and 6. What’s great about Commercial Type is it’s place in modern day corporate design. Most of the faces available here are a refreshing alternative to the Helrutiger escape route, most of us are guilty of taking (I need to design a logo. If I use Helvetica, my work will be considered clean and tight).

I’m particularly fond of the Stag collection and it seems that 2010 is going to be the year of the slap serif. It’s been coming for a long time. Check out Adelle from FontShop. Packs a punch.

Another foundry brought to my attention this week is Radim Pesko. According to the website “RP is new small scale digital type-foundry established in 2009 by Radim Peško. The foundry is focused on development of typefaces that are both formally and conceptually distinctive.”

Personal favourite has got to be the Mercury font.

If you’ve got to this point of the post, you’re either my mum, wife or a fellow typophile, so well done. Here’s some freebies.

Smashing Magazine’s 25 New High Quality Free Fonts (check PT Sans & Tribbon above all else).

P.S. Ever seen a font and not known what it is? Here’s the handiest resource you’ll find this side of a glyph.

Will the Apple iTablet be a bitter pill for your website?

Will you website work on the new Apple tablet?

Will your website work on the new Apple tablet?

So, it’s just one week before we finally get to see the Apple iTablet/iBook/iPad/iPallette/iSlate/iDontcarewhatitscalled (probably) at their event on the 27th. Exciting stuff. But unless I’m missing something then there has been surprisingly little mentioned about how the rise of tablet computing (it isn’t just Apple developing a tablet computer) might affect the way we build web resources.

For instance, the iPhone doesn’t work with Flash and according to most people in the know about these things, nor will the tablet. Why? Primarily because it dissolves battery at an alarming rate (as highlighted to me by the Guardian’s tech editor Charles Arthur on Twitter today). It’s also quite buggy. I should say now that I’m not actually the Manifest London web nerd guru – that title goes to Mike Francis, but for me it seems the rise of tablet computing (and indeed the mobile internet) could therefore have a big impact for a lot of content-heavy websites.

We noted in our 2010 predictions that Javascript frameworks such as jQuery and Mootools will increasingly rival Flash (and software in general) in terms of creating dynamic page content – but as more and more people access the web via smartphones or tablets, surely we will also become less motivated to use Flash? How much of your website content uses Flash? Have you considered what your site looks like on an iPhone, or how it will look using a tablet computer? I don’t think Flash will disappear anytime soon, but there will certainly be an impact for sites that rely too heavily on Flash content.

Other growing considerations will include content dimensions – the iPhone has very specific dimensions (which will likely be shared by the forthcoming tablet) which could cause a headache for those using other proportions. Apple’s proprietary software will all use iFrame for video rendering and content that doesn’t use this will have compatibility issues (however slight). As an aside, very few video cameras render video in iFrame, meaning quick editing on iPhoto is more difficult and precious battery will be used converting the files in the editing process.

Anyway – all of this is pie-in-the-sky until the 27th so we’ll just have to sit tight and wait and see. But if what I think is true, then we’ll see a rush from brands to create websites that perform to their optimum on a tablet. For those that don’t have the budget to create a dedicated app or an alternate mobile site, it could prove a headache.

STOP PRESS! Smartphone apps could save the day for newspapers

Did i brag mention to you I was on holiday over the Christmas period? Well, I was. And it was great. Not only because I was basking in 40 degree heat as London fell victim to its coldest Christmas since the 1970s, but also because I could keep up to scratch with the misery the snow was causing on British shores via the new Guardian iPhone app.

Until now, newspapers’ attitudes towards the web have fluttered between utter disdain and begrudging acceptance. Certainly they have rarely identified (and indeed tapped into) the revenue potential of their online content. However, the Guardian has bucked the trend and gone all-out to develop its online content (even launching a content API last year). Today the ‘paper announced its incredible iPhone app has reached 70,000 downloads in just one month, which means they’ve already made over £167k in revenues (£2m per year if the app continues to be downloaded at the same rate). The mobile web, it seems, provides opportunities as well as risks to the humble newspaper publisher. Time will tell if the app continues to make the Guardian money (the buck doesn’t stop with subscriptions – there are opportunities to make money through affiliate links, eCoupons, premium subscriptions and interactive advertising) but the most interesting thing about the success of the Guardian’s app is that is quite simply an incredible user experience.

When I was sitting on the beach (sorry, did I mention I’ve been on holiday?) reading about Manchester City signing Patrick Viera, it didn’t feel at all like I was reading a website on a small screen (as some apps do) – the entire experience is much better than using a computer. The iPhone, it seems, goes some way to providing the tactile satisfaction of turning the pages of a newspaper, while offering the childlike glee that living in the future brings. Because this, my friends, is the future. A brave new world where you read a newspaper on a mobile phone and it’s not a shoddy, ‘lite’ version with content missing and deranged formatting. A strange and fantastical future where Patrick Viera signs for Manchester City. A future where newspapers might conceivably make some money.

The Guardian clearly has some in-house nouse when it comes to digital content delivery and the app is a joy to use. Load times are quick (even using 3G) and the capability to download the content for offline reading is invaluable. The ‘favourites’ function allows you to save the sections you can’t live without for quick and easy access, and the Guardian’s media rich content – from podcasts to moving pictures – is integrated with the daily news content in a more effective manner than the website has ever managed.

The real breakthrough, however, is the focus on trending articles. The Guardian’s website pioneered foregrounding the ‘most read’ articles for users, but again the iPhone app gives trending topics even more gravitas – the most popular articles seem as prevalent and prominent as the ‘latest news’. One of the tacit pleasures of using the internet is that you are not surfing alone, you are in fact participating in an enormous content ecosystem – every article you read, video you watch or blog you link to is affected by your actions in some way. In reading the Guardian app, you can tap into the vein of UK zeitgeist from wherever you are in the world, and it’s made plain to you that you are reading this because the rest of the world is. By reading the news, you are making the news. It’s lovely, and it’s something newspapers can’t do. Digg’s success is fueled by this feeling of news as a mass participation event – and I can’t wait for their imminent new app launch – but the Guardian’s is a broader, more elegant experience.

Anyway – if you have an iPhone and don’t mind 70% of news content being about climate change and human rights (which I don’t) – then this will be the best £2.39 you ever spent. Equally, if you’re a brand looking for a creative way to bring your services to a smartphone audience, this is a best in class example to follow.

If you’re Rupert Murdoch declaring that paid-for content is the only way for newspapers to make money online, then look away now, the future is blowing you a raspberry.

Qlock

I don’t care that it’s in German. I want this clock.

Happy Nude Year

The Finished Article

The Finished Article

A new year means a new calendar, and what else would be adorning the Manifest Studio wall than the LDNnudetech 2010 calendar. It arrived, as promised, just before Christmas, and looks fantastic. Now, we’d only seen a couple of pages on press (see below), so had an idea about how good it was going to look, but, wow – we’re all very happy with the end result.

We’ve already done a couple of exhaustive posts on this project before, so we’ll keep this one brief (word-wise). Below are a few shots that sort of fill in the gaps between the Leap Anywhere ‘Making of Video’ and the calendar you’ve bought because you’re a nice person who saw this whole exercise the way it should have been seen. As an opportunity to raise a shed load of money for a great cause.

There are still a few left in stock at Firebox, so what are you waiting for? Buy one!

Calendar on press at Waddington & Ledger

Calendar on press at Waddington & Ledger

Calendar on press at Waddington & Ledger

Calendar on press at Waddington & Ledger

First proof arrives at Manifest...

First proof arrives at Manifest...

...and goes on our Christmas Night out for a good 'Proof Read'.

...and goes on our Christmas Night out for a good 'Proof Read'.

Kudos from Milo

Kudos from Milo

DSC01412

Miss March - Poppy Dinsey

DSC01415

Miss June - Hermione Way

DSC01416

Rogue's Gallery

Chrome Vs. Firefox Vs. Safari

Main

Apart from coming in on a Sunday to finish off a pitch, this weekend we’ve mostly been playing with Google’s new Mac released browser Chrome and have been comparing it to studio favourite Firefox and Mac’s own Safari.

Now, lets get things straight first – this comparison is strictly how the normal designer sees stuff and won’t be an essay on how the tabs work. This isn’t Mashable. I am far too northern to wax lyrical or indeed technical about browsers. I was just feeling inspired. It’s basically my Tuesday today (did I mention I was in on a Sunday? Missing the Come Dine With Me marathon?) so the brain’s running faster than normal. Sorta.

Here goes.

1. Dock Icon.

Dock
The release of Firefox 3.5 made for a shinier, slicker dock icon of the Fox humping the world (that’s what it’s meant to be, isn’t it?) and goes along with the old addage, if it ain’t broke add a gradient. Safari’s icon has been the same for ages too – the compass. Yawn. Google chrome’s icon does two things. One – annoys the hell out of me while working as the red bit at the top looks like new mail in the corner of my eye. Cue disappointment when I realise. And B – it looks like that Simon game from back in’t day. Is that a good thing? I don’t know. Maybe they should have based it on Trionimoes. That game ruled.

Winner: Firefox

2. Add Ons.

Addons
Or lack of, if you’re Safari or Googley Chrome. I really, really wanted to scrap FF and start using Chrome at the start of last week, but it wasn’t until actually using the browser properly, on a day to day basis that I really started to miss things like Skipscreen and the handy Web Developer toolbar. What? I like to know how big stuff is exactly with the ruler! And the resize window is indispensible.

Winner: Firefox

3. Awesome Bar.

Awesome
Oh man. I got nerd quivers when Firefox started the awesome bar. “You mean I can pretty much type ANYTHING in that bar, and it’ll find it? That’s AWESOME.” Plus, the search bar options were quality too.

Open up Chrome and what do you get? One bar. One awesome bar. One AWESOME BAR POWERED BY GOOGLE.

Winner: Chrome

4. Tabs.

Tabs
Hmmm. This one is based on how cool they look more than how they function. Just. Safari & Chrome are pretty much the same beast here. Although I actually now prefer Safari’s restraint of the constant tab Firefox employed for 3.5. Just get rid of it! You’re making me click something that doesn’t close! Ahhh!!!

Chrome’s tabs are like Shark fins popping out of the water. CMD+T was never this fun! Duh-DUH. Duh-DUH.

And check out how sweet the little add tab icon is! That’s a winner for me.

Winner: Chrome

5. History / Top Sites.
Now, I don’t know if this really is a cool thing or not. I think loads of people are going to be in love with what Google Chrome does for your recent viewing history and if you compare it to Safari, it is pretty awesome. I mean, seriously, I am not the guy who built the matrix. What’s with the AWFUL curved top sites screens? It actually makes me nauscious. Chrome’s is nice and clean and the switch between thumbnails and a Delicious style list is really, really nice.

The good thing about having thumbnails is that you can see where you’ve been, but doesn’t really work if you view more than, like, 20 sites. Add to that all of your bookmarks. Now if you’re wanting to find something you saw ages ago, but can’t remember the name, but remember how it looked, you’re going to be frustrated. Chrome and Safari will tease you with recently viewed sites or most viewed site. Really, what use is that? I recently SAW THEM. I KNOW WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE!

Firefox doesn’t even bother with it. It just gives you a list. If you can’t remember what site you’re looking for, tough. Snooze you lose.

Winner: Firefox

6. Downloads.

DL
Although Chrome has a very nice self-contained Download bar at the bottom of the browser, it doesn’t forgive the ‘Billy & Johnny’ use of icons to tell you you’re downloading something. Seriously. I’m not 7! I don’t need an icon bigger than my head to tell me something is downloading.

Safari & Firefox use a separate modal window for downloads (i’m talking bigger file downloads here, not saving images to yer desktop..) which is all good. Once again, if it ain’t broke.

Safari loses here because it still opens PDFs in a new tab. And that annoys me no end. So much that I think I actually stopped using Safari for that very reason.

Yes, I am that fickle.

Winner: Firefox.

7. Themes.
Once again, I am not 7. I’ll use my browser as it comes thank you very much.

Winner: Me.

Final result.

Winner

Winner: Firefox

Although I really do like Chrome, maybe i’m being lured by its new shininess. And the fact that I think Firefox is better is two fold. A. Firefox IS better and 2. I’ve used Firefox pretty much everyday for the past year, so when things don’t work the same way, I instantly claim it’s rubbish.

The same thing happened when Adobe discontinued Freehand and made us all migrate to InDesign or Illustrator.

But that’s a whole other blog post.

Ten in 2010 – our predictions for next year…

Ah December. The season to be jolly. And to make ludicrously inaccurate predictions for the year ahead, of course. It seems to me that under the guise of ‘predictions’, most of the soothsaying blog posts that appear at the end of the year read more like Christmas wishes and are more about what the author wants to happen, than what is likely to happen. So, we’ll try to avoid the ‘wishlist’ approach and come up with our 10 predictions for communications in 2010 – but we can’t deny there’s a bit of wishing about some of them (well, if December isn’t a time for wishes, then when is?). So here goes, in no particular order, our Ten in 2010 predictions are:

  1. Social search becomes the norm: For the past ten years, web search has been dominated by Google. When we’ve been in need of anything, from toilet paper to travel advice, we’ve asked Google’s reliable algorithm. In 2010, we’ll see the current ‘hot topic’ of social search become a social norm for all web users. I already ask for recommendations on Twitter before I search on Google in a number of circumstances – particularly if it involves making a purchase – and the recent and ongoing changes to Facebook make crowdsourcing a recommendation or solution much easier. Google.com will always bring more results (and lovely, accurate ones), but recommendations bring with them so much more: trust, peace-of-mind and quite often a witty quip thrown in. That’s probably why Google is testing out its own amazing social search product in Google labs. It’s all a bad sign for SEO companies as they lose their grip on search – especially when you see Google personalised search take hold too. I guess we’ll see the continued growth of SMO as opposed to traditional SEO as well.
  2. Apple changes the way we read: Okay, not just Apple, but touch-screen tablets like the one they’re planning to launch. TechCrunch have written about producing one, and a number of other manufacturers are rumoured to be working on products. Essentially, tablets fill the gap between a smartphone and a notebook – providing a convenient way to browse web pages, read documents or even watch movies on the move. They also potentially spell disaster for products like Amazon’s Kindle. However, there could be business benefits also. What if you were to show up to meetings with tablets for those taking part – allowing participants to view bespoke presentations, or slide notes, or creative design options? They could zoom and scroll through a design as they wish, while the presentation covers the key points. Okay, it sounds complicated and expensive, but we’re just excited about what will no doubt be a nice shiny new toy from Apple.

    Apple's tablet will arrive in 2010 and change the handheld computing landscape

  3. “I have a stream”: 2009 has seen the emergence from the shadows of a number of lifestreams – with Tumblr, Friendfeed (recently bought by Faceboook) and Posterous making the most noise. Technically, Posterous has moved the lifestream on from being an aggregator of social content, to a syndicator as well – which is where the true potential of these services can be seen. As such, 2010 will see more and more ‘aggregator/syndicator’ apps appearing, and more and more people using them. Updating Posterous can automatically update your Twitter account, Facebook profile, blog, Flickr profile and more. It’s quick, easy, and simple. You can even just send it an email and the content appears everywhere. As people develop more social media identities they need a place to keep them. Having to access dozens of websites, desktop apps or even phone apps to keep things up-to-date is a massive hassle. Posterous and its ilk are already successfully catering for a need that will grow exponentially in 2010.
  4. Augmented reality becomes a reality: We love augmented reality (AR) at Manifest. There are obviously amazing benefits it can bring, but our main reason for loving it is it feels like something from Back to the Future II. And if you haven’t seen the Google Goggles video already you’re in for a treat. AR has arrived quicker than expected really, and the pace of development looks set to continue. Bionic Eye and Tube Deluxe are the AR apps in my iPhone arsenal, but the opportunities for brands are there for all to see. Imagine a gym where you look at a machine and are given a tutorial, for example, or pointing your iPhone app at a packet of crisps to get a calorie count/CO2 impact/price comparison.

    Augmented Reality (AR) is not only like living in Back to the Future II - it actually works

  5. Wave says hello: Google Wave is here already. But not really. In 2010 we expect it to start making a big impact, although a mass switchover from email is pie in the sky yet. Wave has loads of benefits for businesses and collaborators, but we’ve not seen them yet because most of us don’t have any contacts on there. In 2010, the early adopters will get to grips with what promises to change the way we communicate online. If this post were a wave, for instance, you could comment on each prediction underneath the actual  paragraph you’re commenting on. I could then ‘rewind’ the post to see how the comments have been added over time, and the final Wave would be a collaborative effort – not just my work. It’s really pretty cool – and in 2010 we’ll start to see why. Hopefully we’ll all get some more invitations as well.

    In 2009 - we were all waving with ourselves. 2010 will see wave unleashed.

  6. We're already seeing promos for Twitter services appear on our twitter profiles, contextual ads are next

    Twitter already has the space to add contextual ads

    Adding context to Twitter: We predict contextual advertising will finally make its way onto Twitter in 2010. This year saw the introduction of where the ads will likely run – in the top right of the page as pictured – so they won’t be invasive if they do arrive. By making ads relevant to the twitterstream they won’t just relate to an individual, but to their precise activities that day. Everyone keeps talking about ‘how twitter will make money’ but there are so many ways they can make it without affecting the service, I think we’ll see people get bored of that question as Twitter continues to thrive.

  7. Paying won’t pay: Murdoch’s idea that online content should be paid for will be proved unworkable. At least in the UK. As long as the BBC exists, nobody will be able to charge their UK readership successfully – which to be honest, is great. A lot of people talk about not wanting to pay the license fee to fund the 25th series of 2 pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps – but they forget the money goes to genuinely pioneering online resources such as iPlayer. There are plenty of ways for media to monetize their content (such as affiliate links and freemium content privileges) but so far it’s not worked – but nor will making people pay for something they can get for free elsewhere. The Huffington Post only flourished because newspapers began charging for their online content, don’t forget. We predict many publishers will start charging, people will stop using, then many publishers will stop charging.

    Paying for content is about as popular as Gordon Brown

  8. Social media agencies will struggle: We’ve said already on this blog that dedicated social media gencies shouldn’t exist, and in 2010 we predict that unfortunately the dedicated social media agency will begin to struggle and we’ll see the launch of new dedicated agencies slowing. This is because they’ll be competing with PR and marketing agencies increasingly able to match their expertise in social media, whilst coupling it with skills across the broader media mix. Ooh, we’re getting a bit controversial now.
  9. Not so Flash now: Okay – this one is from our new media nerd guru Mike. He says that we’re going to see JavaScript frameworks begin to do much more of the complex web tasks which had previously relied on software, such as Adobe Flash and Director, as well as Microsoft Silverlight. “it’s to do with the continued development of JavaScript frameworks.” he says, “For example, the Manifest site only uses Flash to render video, as it is impossible to do this cross-browser using HTML. A couple of years ago simple animation and dynamic page elements would have been produced in Flash, however as popular JavaScript frameworks such as jQuery, MooTools and Scriptaculous continue to grow in terms of their development communities, I think we will begin to see more and more complex animation and dynamic content produced using the browser to render this rather than software (Flash player/Shockwave/Microsoft Silverlight).” Make any sense to you? Nah, me either. But it’s in at number 9 because Mike generally knows what he’s talking about.
  10. Fonts for the memories: Now for some designery predictions from Martin in the creative studio. According to the Chinese, 2009 was the year of the Ox, but for Manifest, it was the year of Helvetica. We predict that 2010 will be the year of…. Helvetica. Again. Cos it always is. But maybe things will change. We think TheSans, Kievet, DIN fonts will probably pop up more next year (DIN has been the best seller at Fontshop 3 years running, so we’re not exactly out on a limb here). Oh, and we predict there will be more and more websafe fonts used for logotypes, following IKEA’s recent switch to Verdana from Futura. If you ask us, it’s not a good example to follow – it’s just a bit lazy.

    Could Helvetica's reign be over? Nah. Probably not.

Okay – so that’s our ten for 2010. What do you think? Don’t be shy – let us know if you think we’re talking nonsense – or if there’s something we’ve missed (although be fair, we were restricted to ten).

Google Chrome for Mac

Google Chrome for OSX

Yup. Google Chrome is finally available for the rest of us. In Beta admittedly, but still. Another browser for team Multimedia to test sites in. Whether it’ll become more popular than Firefox in the Manifest browser pecking order needs to be seen, but props for the colour halftone Popeye on the home page.

The Year’s Best Handheld? Probably not.

But it is a great ad for The Sun (via Gym Class Magazine)



Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes